
The U.S. drug pipeline continues to be robust. By one estimate, nearly 7,000 medicines are currently in development — almost three-quarters of them potentially first-in-class.
The numbers are only part of the story. Scientific developments are altering the pace and focus of drug development, while regulatory changes are shortening approval times and, in some cases, reducing the level of evidence required prior to drug approval. These marketplace realities pose new challenges for payors in their efforts to maintain patient access while keeping specialty cost and trend in check.
Record FDA Approvals
The past year was an exceptional time for drug approvals. The FDA approved 46 novel medications in 2017 — more than double the 2016 figure, and the highest number of approvals in more than two decades. One-third of these new drugs were first-in-class, and 37 percent were designated breakthrough drugs, up from 32 percent in 2016 and 22 percent in 2015.
Part of the quicker pace of approvals has to do with a renewed focus at the agency on reshaping the drug approval process to expedite the availability of therapies that show dramatic results in early clinical studies.
The FDA also accelerated the approval process for generics, approving a record 1,027 in 2017 and took steps to encourage the development and use of biosimilars.
Scientific Advances
What is striking about the pipeline today is the preponderance of drugs with new mechanisms of action and that, increasingly, challenge the very concept of conventional pharmacologic therapy.
Robust Pipeline of Drugs with Novel Mechanisms
New, just-emerging approaches to therapy promise profound change for some patient groups. Last year the FDA approved the first-ever gene therapies that use genetic engineering to replace mutated genes, effectively treating, and potentially curing, the patient’s medical condition. Gene therapies launched so far have been expensive and the cost trend will likely continue. A course of therapy with Luxturna, which treats a form of inherited vision loss, costs $850,000.
Populations
Rare diseases continue to play an ever-increasing role in the drug pipeline. Of the 46 new drugs approved in 2017, 18 were approved for orphan indications — diseases that affect 200,000 or fewer U.S. patients. And if supplemental indications for already-approved drugs are included, the agency approved a record-breaking 77 therapies for orphan indications last year.
Equally striking is the emergence of several biologic therapies that are not intended to treat orphan or rare conditions. Today, complex biologic treatments are increasingly being brought to market for diseases with much larger patient populations, such as migraine, asthma, and arthritis, but still with comparably high list prices. This means their impact on trend is growing exponentially, forcing payors to find new strategies for dealing with them.
Effective Cost Management
Managing the impact of drugs launching at higher and higher prices and concurrently wrestling with year-over-year price inflation is not simple at the best of times, but the emerging pipeline trends present an additional set of challenges. Meeting these challenges will require a deep understanding of plan member needs and clinical considerations, a method for staying abreast of changes in the evolving specialty marketplace, and an unwavering commitment to both quality patient care and proactive cost management.
Real-Time Monitoring and Dynamic Management
In a rapidly changing marketplace, opportunities to improve outcomes, boost value, and control costs emerge quickly. CVS Health actively monitors the pipeline for payors. Our interactive trend dashboard identifies drivers of cost and utilization and helps model the adoption and cost impact of new drugs. We also share Budget Impact Models with clients for drugs that have the greatest potential to impact trend. And for complex fields like oncology, our Novologix platform enables prior authorization across benefits while integrating current guidelines for regimen-level review. This not only provides effective cost management but is also a precision medicine tool, helping ensure that all members have the opportunity to receive the most current standard of care.
Value-Based Management
With more manufacturers seeking supplemental indications for high-cost drugs and growing competitiveness in key therapy areas, targeted management strategies such as indication- and outcome-based contracting and indication-based pricing can help payors effectively manage cost. Such strategies involve negotiating prices and rebates for a specific diagnosis rather than at a therapy class level, and tying reimbursement for a drug to the value it delivers in treating a specific condition, as measured by patient outcomes. We currently have indication-based formularies and outcomes-based contracts in place for autoimmune conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis, and continue to look for additional value-based management opportunities for high-cost therapy classes.
We are also innovating to help address the issue of new drug launch price escalation. In this work, we are utilizing analyses from the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) and an advisory board of independent health economic experts to develop innovative plan designs that more closely align drug price to value.
Maximizing the Potential of Biosimilars
Biosimilars are more complex to manage than generics, but our experience is that with appropriate plan design, formulary management, and utilization management — and attention to member incentives — it is possible to get prescribers and members to take advantage of the cost benefits biosimilars offer.
Expanding Tiered Formularies to Specialty Medications
UM (Utilization management).
* CVS Specialty internal data, March 2018. Savings will vary based upon a variety of factors including things such as plan design, demographics and programs implemented by the plan.
New Modalities, New Coverage Models
Emerging categories such as gene therapies are potentially transformative, but will require similarly innovative strategies for how they are covered. Some of the most basic issues — for instance, whether emerging gene therapies should fall under the medical or pharmacy benefit — still need to be settled. The tradeoff of short-term and long-term costs, as well as mortality rates and quality of life impact over time need to be better assessed. And new financing mechanisms for addressing the high cost of therapy — such as annuity models or reinsurance — must be developed. We are actively involved in each of these crucial areas of model development.
Explore Programs
*New drug count includes new molecular entities, new biologics, biosimilars, new combinations, new formulations. Projections by Pipeline Services, 2018. This document contains references to brand-name prescription drugs that are trademarks or registered trademarks of pharmaceutical manufacturers not affiliated with CVS Health. CVS Health uses and shares data as allowed by applicable law, and by our agreements and our information firewall. Image source: Licensed from Getty Images, 2018. ©2018 CVS Health. All rights reserved.